Closing the Climate Gap: Capacity Building, Technical Assistance and SB 1072
Something amazing is happening in California. We’re charging polluters for the pollution they cause and putting that money to work in our communities planting street trees, connecting affordable housing to clean public transit, installing solar and more. But in some places, very little of this is happening at all.
THE CHALLENGE: Communities That Most Need Transformative Investments Can’t Get Them
Over the last several years, communities burdened by poverty and pollution have been prioritized for polluter fund investments. While recent data show that almost all impacted communities in the State have received investments, many of the most severely under-resourced communities still struggle to achieve real transformative impact.
One big reason why some communities have yet to fully participate in California’s clean energy revolution is the lack of capacity and technical know-how. These communities urgently want to take advantage of available funds and policies to advance climate equity, but the lack of resources and technical experience make participation difficult. To successfully reach our climate goals and to ensure that all parts of the state benefit meaningfully from California’s climate actions, we must establish the backbone infrastructure to provide capacity building and technical assistance to all and particularly the most impacted communities.
We have seen the problem up close in communities throughout the San Joaquin Valley, the Inland Empire, and smaller cities throughout California. Big hopes and aspirations are not enough to compete with communities with established networks of technical assistance providers and plenty of staff capacity.
A recent analysis by UC Davis of the Strategic Growth Council’s technical assistance pilot clearly shows the benefit of providing technical assistance. The report found that applicants who received comprehensive technical assistance overwhelmingly outcompeted those who did not, that projects serving disadvantaged communities were less likely to make it to the full application stage without technical assistance, and that comprehensive technical assistance was not equally distributed across regions.
Technical assistance made the difference. The same study also highlighted the lack of coordination and alignment among state implementing agencies as a barrier to effectively and efficiently administering climate funds, which hurt the same communities that lack access to technical assistance. The California Energy Commission’s SB 350 Barriers Study also identified lack of coordination and alignment as key barriers to low-income communities adopting clean energy investments.
THE SOLUTION: Capacity Building + Comprehensive Technical Assistance
So how does SB 1072 meet the challenge?
For California to meet its commitment to our most vulnerable communities and close the climate gap, the state must prioritize and invest in deep outreach, capacity building and technical assistance, as well as coordination across state climate resources. Our bill proposes a comprehensive approach in 3 parts (see our fact sheet!):
Where is the bill now?
SB 1072 will be heard before the Senate Appropriations committee on Tuesday, May 22. From there, it needs to get passed by the Senate and then go to the Assembly policy and fiscal committees.
Back To News